Editorial Update/Images
Using the Image Tool to insert and substitute images
We can now insert and substitute images using the Editorial Image Tool in the website Preview. The most common images we deal with are formulae and forms. Where, following an amendment in XMetaL, an expected image does not appear as part of the inserted/substituted text when we preview it, or where we simply need to substitute an existing image within a provision, we can now access the image update functionality by clicking on an “Update image” button which will appear in the Preview page in the location of the image. The instructions for using the image update functionality are laid out in the sections below.
Before you use the Image Tool
|
WARNING: For update tasks involving multiple PiTs, where we have edited Forms images (especially where we are doing several actions, such as inserting, substituting or repealing multiple forms at a specific PiT), the editorial system sometimes gets confused about their start dates and mixes up old and new images a few PiTs further down the line. So, firstly, always check that you have used the timeline resolver to make sure the correct PiT is in place before you start using the image tool to edit the Forms. Secondly, once you have edited Forms images submit for early review at that PiT. The reviewer can then review and publish them and the update feed on publishing will hopefully stabilise the start dates for the images. The update can then be re-allocated back to the editor to carry on with the remaining update. Also note: 1. If your amendment only involves substituting an existing image within a provision that otherwise stays the same, don't forget to make sure that the PiT for that amendment is showing on the timeline before you carry out the substitution, otherwise you will substitute the image in a previous PiT. Use the timeline resolver to add in the PiT you are working before you substitute the image.
|
Other amendments to images
Textual amendments to images
If an image is not being wholly inserted or substituted, but there are textual amendments being made to the details of forms, maps, diagrams, etc. that are held as image files, we are unable to edit the image files ourselves. Instead, Update Editors should manually insert an F-note annotation in a suitable position, invariably at Provision/Part/Schedule/ level, in relation to the form/map/diagram tagging and provide a more explanatory annotation using the drafter’s text.
See Annotation Conventions - textual amendments to images for examples of the form of words to use in the F-note.
A suitable position for the F-note reference might be within the <ukl:Number> tags of the Schedule that contains the form, or within the <ukl:Title> tags of the form if available (see examples below). The Element List window will show you whether it is possible to insert a <ukl:CommentaryRef> tag in your chosen location.
S.I. 2013/3156, Sch. para. 23:
If the amendments are more complex or so large that it seems unfeasible to include details in the annotation, then we could summarise the amendments in the annotation rather than giving verbatim text, but there should still be a more explanatory F-note than usual. If you have any difficulty formulating such an annotation, consult a Review Editor.
See also Annotation Conventions - textual amendments to images.
Omission of an image
If an amendment requires that an image is omitted, the tagging for the image should be repealed and the image replaced with a dotty line with an F-note:
In this example, the forms are located within a Schedule paragraph that has been tagged as a ukl:P1Group, and it was possible to include the dotty line in the XML as follows:
Alternatively, where the image is not contained in a paragraph with its own set of tagging, but is located directly in the ukl:ScheduleBody, a set of ukl:P tags containing the dotty line followed by a non-breaking space and F-note reference may be inserted at the appropriate place, and the existing image and it's tagging can be removed. For example:
If you are unsure how to do this, contact a Review Editor and they can ask TSO to do the amendment if neccessary.




